Management of patients undergoing same-day discharge primary total hip and knee arthroplasty


KEY POINTS
  • Same-day discharge total hip and knee arthroplasty is becoming more common, made feasible by perioperative advances such as minimally invasive surgical approaches, the use of tranexamic acid and multimodal and pre-emptive analgesia.

  • According to protocols developed to ensure patient safety, candidates for same-day surgery are people younger than 80 years without preoperative bleeding disorders, cirrhosis, clinically important cardiac disease or end-stage renal disease.

  • When patients are selected appropriately, rates of adverse events and functional outcomes are similar to those observed among patients who undergo inpatient-protocol arthroplasty, patient satisfaction is high, and procedures are cost-effective.

  • Careful education of patients, by surgeons and primary care physicians, can help to dispel myths about outpatient total joint arthroplasty and thereby optimize success.

Total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty are established procedures for the effective treatment of complications of advanced arthritides or avascular necrosis. With new surgical techniques and approaches to perioperative care, the average length of an inpatient stay associated with these procedures has decreased in recent years.1 The demand for primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years has been projected to increase by more than 50% by 2030.2 With the annual frequency of these procedures already rapidly increasing owing to an aging population, same-day discharge arthroplasty may be a feasible solution to the increased pressure to decrease health care costs.3

We review observational and interventional research on the effectiveness of same-day discharge total hip and total knee arthroplasty (Box 1). In this review, same-day discharge arthroplasty refers to protocols that see patients discharged home on the same calendar day as the procedure, usually within 4 to 8 hours after the end of the surgery. This is distinct from discharge within 23 hours after surgery, which is often labelled as “outpatient” in the literature. However, many large database studies do not distinguish between the 2 kinds of protocols, and some evidence presented herein includes patients who spent up to 23 hours in hospital.

Box 1:

Summary of literature review

We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed (1980 to December 2018) and MEDLINE (1950 to December 2018) databases to identify eligible studies on same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. We used a combination of subject headings, including “total joint arthroplasty,” “hip arthroplasty,” “knee arthroplasty,” “outpatient,” “same-day discharge,” “length of stay,” “ambulatory,” “rapid recovery protocol,” “short stay,” and “day-case” and limited the search to articles written in English. Reference lists of selected articles were also reviewed for additional studies. Relevant articles included clinical trials, meta-analyses, prognostic studies, observational studies and retrospective studies.

Which patients are candidates for outpatient total hip and total knee arthroplasty?

Many factors must be considered when selecting patients for same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty. Ensuring patient safety is important. An analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data identified patient age older than 80 years as an independent predictor for adverse events or readmission in this population (odds ratio of 4.16).4 As such, many protocols and studies have used this cut-off in their selection criteria, and most patients selected for same-day procedures are relatively young — in their 50s and 60s.58 Other commonly used criteria include a Timed Up and Go test of 10 seconds or less,9 and an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 1–2, measured preoperatively.4,10

Exclusion criteria focus primarily on the presence of certain comorbidities. Observational studies have shown that, among candidates for knee and hip arthroplasty, bleeding disorders, liver cirrhosis and stage 3–5 renal disease are independent risk factors for adverse events or readmission (Box 2).4,1121 Findings regarding the contribution of elevated body mass index (> 35 or 40 kg/m2) and diabetes mellitus to an increase in adverse events are mixed.4,15,16 A retrospective observational study of more than 1000 patients found that most complications (71%) requiring physician intervention after total hip or total knee arthroplasty were cardiopulmonary in nature.14 However, cardiac history (myocardial infarction, previous cardiac surgery or stents) alone does not seem to increase risk of adverse events in otherwise well-selected patients when intraoperative blood loss is minimized and perioperative hypotension is carefully managed.6,8,1618 Similarly, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1720 and previous deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus6,8,18 have not been clearly associated with increased rates of adverse events.

Box 2:

Outpatient total joint arthroplasty exclusion criteria4,921

Absolute

Medical

Social

  • Inability to participate in preoperative counselling (i.e., lack of mental capacity, lack of means of transportation)

Relative

Medical

  • Age > 80 years

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification > 2

  • Severe obstructive sleep apnea

  • Current, or history of, significant cardiac disease

  • Diabetes mellitus

  • Body mass index > 35

Physical function

Social

Social factors also play a role in the appropriate selection of patients. Many protocols involve some form of preoperative counselling outlining the general flow of the hospital stay, pain management and postoperative physical therapy, whether it be from a surgeon, nurse, coordinator or physiotherapist.68 Patients must have not only the mental capacity to participate actively in these sessions, but also a means of transportation in order to attend. The literature has identified a strong social support system as essential for assistance (both physically and mentally) in the perioperative period, particularly the first night after discharge.21

Several risk assessment scores have been developed to assist with selection of patients for same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty to minimize risk of adverse events or readmission. 22,23 The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment score considers the presence, severity and medical optimization of various conditions and assigns a score in 9 comorbidity areas, including general medical, hematological and cardiac. A cumulative score of less than 60 more precisely predicted same-day or next-day discharge than American Society of Anesthesiologists score or Charlson comorbidity index when tested in a retrospective cohort of 1120 patients.22 The Readmission Risk Assessment Tool assigns points for 9 modifiable risk factors, such as Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization, tobacco use, obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. A score of 3 or greater was associated with higher odds of readmission after primary hip or knee arthroplasty when tested in a large retrospective cohort.23 This tool may therefore also be useful when selecting lower-risk patients for outpatient arthroplasty.

What perioperative advances have enabled same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty?

The most common barriers to discharge in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty are hypotension, pain and nausea.24 However, greater uptake of minimally invasive surgical approaches has allowed patients to benefit from decreased soft-tissue damage, reduced blood loss, less postoperative pain and quicker mobilization after surgery.25,26 Many of the studies that have assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of same-day discharge have used either the anterior approach,5,27,28 a 2-incision technique, 17,29 or minimally invasive posterior18 approaches for total hip arthroplasties, and quadriceps-sparing approaches6,19 for total knee arthroplasties. Although use of minimally invasive approaches is important, perioperative innovations in managing blood loss and optimizing analgesia have contributed most substantially to making same-day discharge arthroplasties possible.

A vital advance in minimizing perioperative blood loss has been the routine use of tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic agent, often given before surgical incision, which binds to plasminogen and prevents fibrin degradation.30 Recent meta-analyses have shown strong evidence that tranexamic acid, given topically, orally or intravenously, substantially decreases blood loss in both total hip and total knee arthroplasty, with an associated decreased risk of transfusion.31,32

Successful perioperative pain management for total joint arthroplasty is multimodal,33,34 with pre-emptive treatment to prevent central sensitization of the nervous system,6,34,35 limited use of narcotics (particularly intravenous) to prevent acute adverse effects that include hypotension or oversedation, and to minimize nausea and urinary retention, 2 barriers to delayed patient discharge.17 Local infiltrative analgesia — usually periarticular injection of a dilute cocktail that commonly comprises ropivacaine, epinephrine and ketorolac tromethamine — is a commonly used adjunct.3638 Both general and neuraxial anesthetics have been used for same-day discharge arthroplasty procedures. 5,17,19,28 Although national database studies have shown higher rates of complications with general anesthesia in populations of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty as a whole,39,40 higher complication rates have yet to be shown among those undergoing outpatient procedures, presumably as a result of selecting healthier patients. Because a meta-analysis of studies of neuraxial anesthesia that included intrathecal morphine showed an increased risk of nausea, vomiting and pruritis, 41 newer protocols for neuraxial anesthesia avoid use of intrathecal opioids. The findings of a recent matched cohort analysis also suggest that higher doses of intrathecal local anesthetic (such as bupivacaine) may delay recovery of function of the lower extremities, thereby also delaying safe discharge.5

Use of postoperative cryotherapy to augment postoperative pain management and rehabilitation in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty has increased recently, although a 2012 Cochrane review found low-quality evidence for improved range of motion, and very low-quality evidence for a small decrease in blood loss and pain scores only at 48 hours, with no evidence to support change in transfusion rate or analgesia use, from cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty.42 A more recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials of cryotherapy after total hip arthroplasty showed no significant difference for blood loss or pain management in the first 24 hours.43

For total knee arthroplasty specifically, use of a tourniquet during surgery has been shown to decrease intraoperative blood loss, although a meta-analysis found overall calculated blood loss and need for transfusion to be unaffected by intraoperative tourniquet use.44 Although visualization of the surgical field may improve with use of a tourniquet, it is important to consider potential adverse effects, which include decreased range of motion in the first days postoperatively and increased risk of thrombotic events, hematoma and nerve palsy.44 Some studies have also shown increased postoperative pain with tourniquet use45,46 as well as increased quadriceps dysfunction.47,48 Whether to use no tourniquet, to limit use or to use one for the full procedure is a question that remains unanswered for same-day discharge joint arthroplasty.

Single-shot or continuous femoral nerve blocks have long been used effectively to decrease postoperative pain in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty both on their own or to complement neuraxial anesthesia.49 Some centres have used femoral nerve blocks instead of general or neuraxial anesthesia among patients undergoing same-day procedures with success.7,20 However, an adverse effect of this approach is acute quadriceps weakness with decreased mobility and increased risk of falls,50,51 which means that femoral nerve block is unlikely to be useful in same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty protocols. Adductor canal block, which involves injection of local anesthetic into the adductor canal, anesthetizing the posterior branch of the obturator nerve and branches of the femoral nerve distal to the quadriceps motor branches,52 was shown in a recent meta-analysis to have equivalent pain control to femoral nerve block, with better preservation of quadriceps strength and improved mobilization.53 Another study noted subjectively lower worst pain, and greater pain relief at 24 hours, when adductor canal block was combined with periarticular infiltration compared with periarticular infiltration alone.54 As more anesthesiologists become familiar with this technique, its widespread use as an analgesic adjunct could decrease opioid requirements and may allow more patients to be eligible for same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty.

What can a patient expect after outpatient total knee or total hip arthroplasty?

A typical protocol, as described in a recent study, is as follows.5 Patients are kept in the postanesthesia care unit for observation until they meet discharge criteria, which are usually based on a postanesthetic recovery score that accounts for the level of consciousness, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen levels, nausea, pain levels and recovery of lower limb muscle function. Once cleared to leave postanesthesia recovery, patients return to the surgical day care unit to be assessed by a physiotherapist. Patients are cleared for discharge only if they can effectively and safely perform independent transfers and climb stairs with an assistive device (such as crutches or a walker). Repeat administrations of intravenous antibiotics and oral tranexamic acid are given before discharge. An anteroposterior pelvic radiograph for total hip arthroplasty, and anteroposterior pelvic and lateral knee radiographs for total knee arthroplasty, are performed and reviewed by the surgical team. If the postoperative radiograph is found to be satisfactory, patients are then discharged only if they exhibit stable vital signs, can tolerate a regular diet, have adequate pain control with oral analgesics and feel comfortable being discharged home. Postoperative stays usually range from 4 to 8 hours.

Although same-day discharge arthroplasty protocols differ in some elements, safety of discharge is their common theme. Most protocols have specific physical therapy milestones that must be met before a patient can be discharged, usually involving independent transfer from supine to chair to stand, ambulation for a set distance using an assistive device, and the ability to ascend and descend a flight of stairs.68,1719,28 Protocols must also involve prophylactic therapies for hypovolemia, pain and nausea,5,17 and treatments to address poorly controlled pain, nausea, hypotension, dizziness or oversedation.17 Although success has been reported at an ambulatory surgical centre,20 any new protocol should ideally be piloted at a centre with inpatient capabilities, to allow for admission if necessary.6,28,55

Lastly, postdischarge supports and surveillance vary greatly, ranging from merely the ability to call the clinic or surgeon’s administrative assistant if there are issues, to remote postoperative home monitoring systems that wirelessly transmit vital signs and pain scores in real time.56,57 Usual postoperative wound checks are appropriate. Studies that have compared patients treated using standard inpatient protocols with those treated under an outpatient protocol have shown no difference in the rate of superficial or deep surgical infections.7,28

How do outcomes of outpatient protocols compare with those of traditional inpatient protocols?

One multicentre, prospective, randomized trial with a total of 220 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty compared the inpatient with the outpatient approach and found no difference in re-operations, hospital readmissions, emergency department visits or acute office visits.28 A recent matched cohort study performed at a Canadian centre showed no difference in the rate or severity of adverse events up to 90 days between same-day discharge and inpatient unilateral total hip arthroplasties. In the cohort of 136 patients who were discharged on the day of surgery, there were no serious adverse events.5 Other matched cohort studies comparing same-day discharge with inpatient total joint arthroplasty have shown no difference in complications, readmissions or emergency department visits, 27,58 with 1 study even showing a significantly lower rate of 90-day readmission rates in the same-day discharge cohort.59 However, there are relatively few high-quality comparative studies.

The findings of studies that did not distinguish between same-day discharge and discharge within 23 hours can still provide some important insights. A recent systematic review with inclusion of 10 publications (a mix of same-day discharge and discharge within 23 h) with a total of 1009 patients, of which 94.5% were successfully discharged on the same day as surgery, showed the reoperation rate was 1.98%. The rate of readmission within 90 days was 0.89%, whereas the rate of minor and major complications were 1.29% and 0.10%, respectively.24 Similarly, a review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data of patients discharged within 24 hours postsurgery showed rates of severe adverse events and unplanned readmissions of 1.3% and 1.9%, respectively.4 These results compare favourably with general US database rates, which range from 1.7% to 6.4% for 30-day readmission rates and from 4.0% to 11.5% for 30-day complication rates.6062 These rates are for all arthroplasty patients (of which a very small percentage would be outpatient programs; about 1%–2%). Furthermore, using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, matched cohort studies of within-23-hours discharge versus inpatient total joint arthroplasty showed no difference in overall adverse events or readmission rates.15,63 Of note, however, patients discharged within 23 hours had a lower risk of thromboembolic events but an increased risk of return to the operating room (particularly in the total knee arthroplasty cohort). However, the reason for reoperation could not be elucidated because of lack of details in the database, and this result has not been demonstrated in other studies.15

In terms of functional outcomes, a prospective comparative cohort study of same-day discharge and inpatient total knee arthroplasties showed no difference in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscores at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.58 Quality of recovery scores (QoR-9) were significantly better on postoperative day 1 in the outpatient group, with no significant difference at other time points up to 28 days.58 A prospective matched cohort study of 64 patients who were discharged within 23 hours after total knee arthroplasty found no difference in Knee Society knee and function scores or knee range of motion at a mean follow-up of 24 months.7 With respect to total hip arthroplasty, the previously mentioned prospective randomized trial comparing same-day discharge and inpatient total hip arthroplasty showed no difference in visual analogue scale pain scores or Harris hip score functions at 4 weeks.28 Visual analogue scale scores were significantly worse on postoperative day 1 for outpatients by a mean of 0.9, but this is below the minimally clinically important difference of 1.9 for total hip arthroplasty.64

Studies assessing patient satisfaction have indicated that between 80% and 96% of patients report that they would have outpatient arthroplasty again.17,18,20 Among 52 total hip arthroplasty outpatients, 94% would recommend the same-day procedure to others, and 87% felt that having a same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty improved their confidence and accelerated their recovery.18 A qualitative study using semistructured interviews with patients and their caregivers also found high levels of satisfaction.65 The authors identified the following influential factors for patients favouring an outpatient procedure: previous negative experiences in the hospital, fear of hospital-acquired illnesses and a preference for recovering in the comfort and privacy of their own home. Although these initial results are largely positive, 16%–19% of patients reported postoperative pain to be a problem.18,20 As outpatient protocols continue to evolve, it will be important to address pain concerns, whether through better patient and caregiver education, improved analgesic pathways or both.

Do outpatient joint arthroplasty programs save the health system money?

In North America, pressure from third-party payers to decrease health care costs while maintaining quality has driven shorter lengths of stay in hospital, including same-day discharge surgical programs.66 One American cost-analysis of same-day discharge versus standard protocol total hip arthroplasty (using data from a single facility that included costs associated with preoperative physiotherapy for outpatient candidates, in-hospital costs, postoperative physiotherapy and home nursing support for outpatient candidates) found that total average cost saving per same-day discharge case was more than 7%, or US$3105.67 This was despite the additional physical therapy and support costs to ensure safety for outpatient candidates. Similar results were shown for outpatient total knee arthroplasty in a study that analyzed Medicare costs, including those attributed to knee osteoarthritis, up to 2 years after surgery.55 A prospective case-control study suggest that these fiscal benefits could translate to the Canadian health care system.68 The authors found a median cost saving of 32.7%, or $3155, for same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty, although this study considered only in-hospital costs and further studies are needed to refine estimates.

Considering that more than 120 000 primary total joint arthroplasties are performed annually in Canada,69 a wide rollout of same-day discharge total knee and total hip arthroplasty programs could lead to savings of many millions of dollars for the Canadian health system. A recent Canadian study that retrospectively examined 400 cases treated at a single centre concluded that about 55% of patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty would have been appropriate candidates for same-day discharge arthroplasty.70

Furthermore, increasing the proportion of outpatient arthroplasties in Canada could assist in addressing problems of inpatient bed capacity and associated costs of increased staffing and cancelled elective operative cases. As outlined above, strict patient selection, use of perioperative advances and establishment of appropriate safeguards are essential, as unplanned readmissions are costly.71

How can primary care physicians optimize outcomes for patients who undergo same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty?

Actively addressing modifiable risk factors, such as smoking and poor nutrition, preoperatively or even before referral, can improve outcomes after any joint arthroplasty procedure. In particular, a history of smoking is an independent risk factor for having an adverse event or unplanned readmission after surgery.4,72,73 Similarly, hypoalbuminemia, a marker of malnutrition, has also been correlated with higher complication and readmission rates for patients undergoing both early-discharge and regular inpatient total joint arthroplasty.4,74,75

Good communication is important to successful same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty, not only from the operating surgeon, but also from the primary physician. One study showed that even though most patients are aware of outpatient total joint arthroplasty and believe their home is the ideal place to recover, 54% still expected a hospital stay of at least 2 days.76 A change in these patient perceptions could start with good communication at the time of referral by the primary care physician, as entrenched preconceptions can be difficult to change later on. Qualitative research has identified patient concerns unique to same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty regarding expectations for recovery, medications and their impact on mobility, the timing of postoperative education and the availability of formal care.65 Preoperative education, proactively addressing concerns, and clarifying the recovery process and pain expectations were suggested to be key to overcoming these challenges.65 Although much of the communication is the responsibility of the operating surgeon, having primary care physicians echo evidence-based advice ensures that patients receive consistent information in their multidisciplinary care.

Conclusion

Through improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty has become a safe procedure for a subset of patients, with outcomes and patient satisfaction equivalent to standard inpatient protocols. In a health care system straining to maintain fiscal viability, these procedures offer a way for health care costs to be decreased substantially. Protocols continue to evolve. However, patient safety must remain the priority with any change. Careful education of patients, by surgeons and primary care physicians, can help shift any misconceptions about outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures and thereby optimize success.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Paul Beaulé reports receiving royalties from Corin, MicroPort and Medacta; consulting fees from Corin, MicroPort, MatOrtho and Zimmer Biomet; and research support from Zimmer Biomet, outside the submitted work. Dr. Beaulé is a board member of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association and International Society for Hip Arthroscopy. Geoffrey F. Dervin reports receiving personal fees from MicroPort Orthopaedics, outside the submitted work. No other competing interests were declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: All of the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work, and the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. All of the authors drafted the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Source link

Previous Newsom Slows Down Promise of Single Payer Healthcare | Open
Next Understanding the Payor's Manual: How to Communicate Acute Respiratory Failure Present in Bacterial and Viral Pneumonia to Avoid Refusals